Kanga Trees

Three directions for your new website.

Each one is a complete homepage built with your real brand: your kangaroo, your greens, your amber, your own photography from the trees, and your own words. Open them on your phone as well as your computer. Tell us which one feels like Kanga Trees and we will build the rest of the site around it.

What is real and what is not. Everything on these pages came from your own material: the kangaroo logo off your business card, your nine services and their descriptions, all 67 service area suburbs, the AS4373 pruning standard, your Kilsyth base, your phone, your email, your Instagram, and your own job photography. The customer reviews are clearly labelled sample wording, because we could not verify real ones. No prices appear anywhere. The forms and the tools are demos, so nothing is sent, stored or forwarded.

Concept homepages

Three distinct designs. Same real content, three different personalities.

Concept one homepage Concept 1

Canopy

Dark and cinematic. Your climbing photography carries the page, the 24/7 emergency line sits at the very top, and a swipeable job reel lets people filter your work by the kind of job they need.

Open concept 1 → Concept two homepage Concept 2

The Tree Check

Light and editorial, built around a tool. A visitor ticks what they can see on their tree and gets a plain English read on how urgent it is and which of your services it points to, before they ring anyone.

Open concept 2 → Concept three homepage Concept 3

Straight Answer

Deep green, one thing on screen at a time, built for a phone. Five questions and the visitor sees the job written up the way you would write it. Anything dangerous jumps them straight to the phone.

Open concept 3 →

Your website today

SEO & AI Search Check

Checked kangatrees.com.au on 3 August 2026

Before any of the concepts existed I ran your current website through the same check I run on every Scalus site. It scored 76 out of 100 for how ready it is for Google, and 38 out of 100 for how ready it is for AI search.

That second number is the one worth talking about. It is not a measure of how the site looks. It is whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI overviews can read the site, understand what Kanga Trees does, and quote it when somebody asks them for a recommendation. At 38 out of 100 the answer today is mostly no.

In total 9 items came back needing attention. They are listed below in the order I would fix them, and every one of them is included in a Scalus build.

76
Overall health
Google search readiness
38
AI search readiness
ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity
Search basics
The tags Google reads first.
73
Structured data
How machines understand the business.
83
AI search readiness
Whether answer engines can read and quote the site.
38
Site files
robots.txt, sitemap and llms.txt.
100
Technical health
HTTPS, headers and valid markup.
92

What I would fix

9 items
  1. Missing

    Canonical URL

    Without a canonical tag Google can treat two versions of the same page as two competing pages.

    What I would do: Add a canonical tag to each page.

  2. Missing

    AI crawlers welcomed

    The AI crawlers are not welcomed by name. ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI each read the site with their own crawler, and if they are not named they may not read you at all.

    What I would do: Name every current AI crawler as allowed.

  3. Missing

    llms.txt

    There is no llms file. This is the file AI models read to understand a business in its own words, and almost no local business has one yet.

    What I would do: Add an llms file with a summary, your services, your area and an FAQ.

  4. Weak

    Meta description

    The description is the grey text under that headline. It is what makes someone click you instead of the next result.

    What I would do: Write a description for every page that says what you do and where.

  5. Weak

    Indexable

    The tags that tell Google it may show your images large and quote more of your text are missing.

    What I would do: Add the full robots meta directives so your listing can show more.

  6. Weak

    WebSite schema

    The site itself is not described to search engines.

    What I would do: Add website level data.

  7. Weak

    Review schema

    Your reviews are not readable by machines, so they cannot show as stars or be quoted back to someone asking for a recommendation.

    What I would do: Publish your reviews with review data attached.

  8. Weak

    Image filenames

    Your image filenames are camera codes rather than words, which is a free ranking signal going to waste.

    What I would do: Rename images to describe what they show.

  9. Weak

    Security headers

    Some standard security headers are missing. Not a ranking issue, but it is the sort of thing that gets a site flagged.

    What I would do: Add the standard security headers.

Checked on 3 August 2026 with the same free checker at scalus.app/seo-geo-checker. Scores move as a site changes, so this is a snapshot of that day, not a permanent grade.